The fifth paragraph is almost unreadable. The writing is terrible but what's worse is the dense namedropping to obfuscate the fact that you can't illustrate an argument or even just explain things.
It's worth noting that Joel didn't mention Nietzsche once in his article. You can claim that "life is struggle" is some indirect citation of Nietzsche so it justifies all your Orthodox-larp schizobabble, but you seem to admit it's not when it comes to what Hitler, or National Socialists generally, believed when you say "They are simply window dressing applied to what is ultimately an appeal to the brute fact of biological struggle on an ontic level" (please ffs write in a more simple manner). Yeah, after WW1 a lot of people who saw the mass death took a bleak "life is struggle" view on things and I'm sure almost none of them read Nietzsche.
I knew even before the fifth paragraph that you'd be taking this article in the typical sleight-of-hand direction of claiming we can't do politics until we subscribe wholly to some holistic religion that explains everything. We've all seen this trick a thousand times before. It's the same thing low IQ Christians who "debate" someone on literally any topic do, just derail from the topic and whatever of substance is being discussed to say "erm ackshually you can't make factual claims about X or Y because you don't believe in objective truth, because you're not a Christian". Whooaahhhhh! 🤯 mind = blown. I guess I need to join your cult to say that the sky is blue! What a worthwhile use of everyone's time debating this crap instead of, you know, how we actually take power. Hey, you ever think to inform the liberal regime who are genociding our race and bringing tens of millions of nonwhites into Europe that their worldview is incorrect because they don't believe in God and objective truth and Platonism and Traditionalism? Genius.
The fifth paragraph is almost unreadable. The writing is terrible but what's worse is the dense namedropping to obfuscate the fact that you can't illustrate an argument or even just explain things.
It's worth noting that Joel didn't mention Nietzsche once in his article. You can claim that "life is struggle" is some indirect citation of Nietzsche so it justifies all your Orthodox-larp schizobabble, but you seem to admit it's not when it comes to what Hitler, or National Socialists generally, believed when you say "They are simply window dressing applied to what is ultimately an appeal to the brute fact of biological struggle on an ontic level" (please ffs write in a more simple manner). Yeah, after WW1 a lot of people who saw the mass death took a bleak "life is struggle" view on things and I'm sure almost none of them read Nietzsche.
I knew even before the fifth paragraph that you'd be taking this article in the typical sleight-of-hand direction of claiming we can't do politics until we subscribe wholly to some holistic religion that explains everything. We've all seen this trick a thousand times before. It's the same thing low IQ Christians who "debate" someone on literally any topic do, just derail from the topic and whatever of substance is being discussed to say "erm ackshually you can't make factual claims about X or Y because you don't believe in objective truth, because you're not a Christian". Whooaahhhhh! 🤯 mind = blown. I guess I need to join your cult to say that the sky is blue! What a worthwhile use of everyone's time debating this crap instead of, you know, how we actually take power. Hey, you ever think to inform the liberal regime who are genociding our race and bringing tens of millions of nonwhites into Europe that their worldview is incorrect because they don't believe in God and objective truth and Platonism and Traditionalism? Genius.
It's embarrassing that Keith retweeted this crap.